SuppScore · Prepared by Whirlwind

The content math

The honest answer to "how will we ever write all this." Mostly, nobody has to. Here's exactly what one live page is made of, section by section.

Magnesium glycinate

/ingredients/magnesium/magnesium-glycinate

The nine sections specified for this page type, and where each one actually comes from

What it isData + AI
Score and tier blockYour data
Evidence and absorptionYour data
How it compares to other formsAI-generated
Best for (sleep, anxiety, cramps)AI-generated
Dose noteYour data
ReferencesYour data
Reviewer byline and dateA person, one line
On-page FAQAI-generated
Same nine sections, shown to scale
4 sections
3 + 1 mixed
1 line
Renders straight from the spreadsheet you already have
Written by Rishabh's pipeline, grounded in your own articles and citations
Actually typed by a person

Of nine sections, four come straight from data you already have, four are AI-generated from your own research library, and one line is the only thing a human writes. This ratio holds across every ingredient and form page, not just this one.

Reviewers, not writers

The advisory board's job on this model is a short checklist per ingredient, roughly ten to fifteen minutes, approving an AI-written draft rather than authoring one from scratch. That's the actual credibility signal Google and AI assistants look for: a named expert stood behind it, not that they typed every word.

Depth follows demand, not a flat rule

Not all ~150 ingredients and ~683 forms need full depth on day one. The keyword universe already ranks them by real search volume, so the highest-demand ones get full treatment at launch and the rest ship at a leaner but still honest bar, then deepen over the following weeks. Same rule already agreed for which forms get their own page, just applied one level down.